Should I switch from QWERTY to Dvorak or Colemak?

This is one of the most debated topics in the typing community. The short answer: for most people who already type at a reasonable speed, the switch is not worth it.

The case for switching

Dvorak and Colemak place the most common English letters on the home row, requiring less total finger movement. Proponents argue this reduces fatigue, lowers RSI risk, and is more comfortable for extended typing sessions. These claims have some research support, especially for RSI reduction.

The case against switching

• Transition time is real. Expect 2–4 months of significantly reduced productivity while relearning.
• Speed gains are small or absent. Top typists exist on QWERTY, Dvorak, and Colemak at similar peak speeds.
• Shared keyboards become a problem. You'll struggle on any keyboard that isn't configured to your layout.
• Most shortcuts break. Ctrl+Z/X/C/V are in completely different positions on Dvorak.

When switching makes sense

If you have early repetitive strain injury symptoms and type heavily, Colemak (which moves only 17 keys and preserves most shortcuts) is worth considering. The reduced finger travel may genuinely help. In this case, see a physical therapist first and consider Colemak as one part of a broader ergonomics adjustment.

The verdict

If you type under 70 WPM on QWERTY, the path to improvement is technique and practice — not switching layouts. If you type over 70 WPM on QWERTY and want to go further, continuing to improve QWERTY technique will produce faster gains than switching. Only switch if you have RSI concerns and are willing to accept the transition cost.